<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My own REAL numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:09:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: banannie</title>
		<link>http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>banannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>I think maybe I quoted Chris a bit out of context, because he is saying that external numbers shouldn&#039;t matter so much. I&#039;m not sure his business clients know what to make of that! But the newsletter is more personal than business focused (which is why I read it, I also have no interest in sales &amp; marketing.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve always said, quality over quantity. And I don&#039;t consider myself a brand. I&#039;ve had people let me know someone else is using the name &quot;Banannie&quot; as if I should be upset by that! It&#039;s a nickname, there are lots of Banannies out there :). Of course, if someone was using the name Pixel Currents, I&#039;d be concerned and look to protect it- but that&#039;s business, and that&#039;s where branding belongs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice tangent :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think maybe I quoted Chris a bit out of context, because he is saying that external numbers shouldn&#39;t matter so much. I&#39;m not sure his business clients know what to make of that! But the newsletter is more personal than business focused (which is why I read it, I also have no interest in sales &#038; marketing.)</p>
<p>I&#39;ve always said, quality over quantity. And I don&#39;t consider myself a brand. I&#39;ve had people let me know someone else is using the name &#8220;Banannie&#8221; as if I should be upset by that! It&#39;s a nickname, there are lots of Banannies out there <img src='http://banannie.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Of course, if someone was using the name Pixel Currents, I&#39;d be concerned and look to protect it- but that&#39;s business, and that&#39;s where branding belongs. </p>
<p>Nice tangent <img src='http://banannie.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean808080</title>
		<link>http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>sean808080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>Nice post, I agree that metrics are important for everyone. Chris Brogan, while a great mind who is enjoying some popularity, appeals to the marketing segment of the web.  As someone who has little interest in sales/marketing as a function, I can&#039;t say I agree on these priorities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not convinced that we&#039;re all brands.  I&#039;m not convinced that one approach fits all makes sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m more like you. I&#039;m interested in the social connectedness that the web offers.  The # of followers or page views means so little to me [on a personal level]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find the most rewarding aspects are the simple pleasures of e-meeting people and learning about things that are outside our our day to day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, I agree that metrics are important for everyone. Chris Brogan, while a great mind who is enjoying some popularity, appeals to the marketing segment of the web.  As someone who has little interest in sales/marketing as a function, I can&#39;t say I agree on these priorities.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not convinced that we&#39;re all brands.  I&#39;m not convinced that one approach fits all makes sense.</p>
<p>I&#39;m more like you. I&#39;m interested in the social connectedness that the web offers.  The # of followers or page views means so little to me [on a personal level]</p>
<p>I find the most rewarding aspects are the simple pleasures of e-meeting people and learning about things that are outside our our day to day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banannie</title>
		<link>http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator>banannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/#comment-1583</guid>
		<description>I think maybe I quoted Chris a bit out of context, because he is saying that external numbers shouldn&#039;t matter so much. I&#039;m not sure his business clients know what to make of that! But the newsletter is more personal than business focused (which is why I read it, I also have no interest in sales &amp; marketing.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve always said, quality over quantity. And I don&#039;t consider myself a brand. I&#039;ve had people let me know someone else is using the name &quot;Banannie&quot; as if I should be upset by that! It&#039;s a nickname, there are lots of Banannies out there :). Of course, if someone was using the name Pixel Currents, I&#039;d be concerned and look to protect it- but that&#039;s business, and that&#039;s where branding belongs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice tangent :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think maybe I quoted Chris a bit out of context, because he is saying that external numbers shouldn&#39;t matter so much. I&#39;m not sure his business clients know what to make of that! But the newsletter is more personal than business focused (which is why I read it, I also have no interest in sales &#038; marketing.)</p>
<p>I&#39;ve always said, quality over quantity. And I don&#39;t consider myself a brand. I&#39;ve had people let me know someone else is using the name &#8220;Banannie&#8221; as if I should be upset by that! It&#39;s a nickname, there are lots of Banannies out there <img src='http://banannie.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Of course, if someone was using the name Pixel Currents, I&#39;d be concerned and look to protect it- but that&#39;s business, and that&#39;s where branding belongs. </p>
<p>Nice tangent <img src='http://banannie.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banannie</title>
		<link>http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>banannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>I think maybe I quoted Chris a bit out of context, because he is saying that external numbers shouldn&#039;t matter so much. I&#039;m not sure his business clients know what to make of that! But the newsletter is more personal than business focused (which is why I read it, I also have no interest in sales &amp; marketing.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve always said, quality over quantity. And I don&#039;t consider myself a brand. I&#039;ve had people let me know someone else is using the name &quot;Banannie&quot; as if I should be upset by that! It&#039;s a nickname, there are lots of Banannies out there :). Of course, if someone was using the name Pixel Currents, I&#039;d be concerned and look to protect it- but that&#039;s business, and that&#039;s where branding belongs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice tangent :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think maybe I quoted Chris a bit out of context, because he is saying that external numbers shouldn&#39;t matter so much. I&#39;m not sure his business clients know what to make of that! But the newsletter is more personal than business focused (which is why I read it, I also have no interest in sales &#038; marketing.)</p>
<p>I&#39;ve always said, quality over quantity. And I don&#39;t consider myself a brand. I&#39;ve had people let me know someone else is using the name &#8220;Banannie&#8221; as if I should be upset by that! It&#39;s a nickname, there are lots of Banannies out there <img src='http://banannie.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Of course, if someone was using the name Pixel Currents, I&#39;d be concerned and look to protect it- but that&#39;s business, and that&#39;s where branding belongs. </p>
<p>Nice tangent <img src='http://banannie.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean808080</title>
		<link>http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>sean808080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banannie.com/blog/2009/09/29/my-own-real-numbers/#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>Nice post but I&#039;m not so sure metrics are important for everyone. Chris Brogan, while a great mind who is enjoying some popularity, appeals to the marketing segment of the web.  As someone who has little interest in sales/marketing as a function, I can&#039;t say I agree on these priorities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not convinced that we&#039;re all brands.  I&#039;m not convinced that one approach fits all makes sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m more like you. I&#039;m interested in the social connectedness that the web offers.  The # of followers or page views means so little to me [on a personal level]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find the most rewarding aspects are the simple pleasures of e-meeting people and learning about things that are outside our our day to day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post but I&#39;m not so sure metrics are important for everyone. Chris Brogan, while a great mind who is enjoying some popularity, appeals to the marketing segment of the web.  As someone who has little interest in sales/marketing as a function, I can&#39;t say I agree on these priorities.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not convinced that we&#39;re all brands.  I&#39;m not convinced that one approach fits all makes sense.</p>
<p>I&#39;m more like you. I&#39;m interested in the social connectedness that the web offers.  The # of followers or page views means so little to me [on a personal level]</p>
<p>I find the most rewarding aspects are the simple pleasures of e-meeting people and learning about things that are outside our our day to day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
