What greed and denial hath wrought

So I sit back and watch our financial system crumble and our retirement savings dwindle, flabbergasted.

photo by Robert Scott Photography

photo by Robert Scott Photography

I’m amazed at the deep-seated denial that brought us here. I’m surrounded by over-extended families in over-sized homes with well-paying but tenuous jobs. Extend the radius a bit and there are the working poor who were told the lie that they could afford a $300,000 home despite the lack of even 5% to put down.

I’m no economist, in fact it’s a good day when I can make sense of my own finances. We’ve got debt, car payments and a decent sized credit card balance on top of the mortgage.

But we’re not at risk of losing our home. And I’m shocked at the numbers who are. How do you explain why otherwise intelligent people thought the housing bubble would grow forever? I understand the temptation to ignore risk. We all made money without trying, a lot of money over a pretty long time. It certainly didn’t help that the few regulators still in place made it insanely easy and cheap to go into deep, deep debt.

Now the government wants to fix it by throwing $700,000,000,000 at the problem. One of the possible sources of that $700,000,000,000? Printing new money.

Flabbergasted.

Comments are closed.
  • http://www.giannii.com Giannii

    It is insane is it not? What are we becoming? I am not sure..

  • http://MyMobileAdventures.blogspot.com Tink *~*~*

    We’re screwed. If we don’t bail out the failing brokerage houses, banks, insurance companies, thousands of people will lose their jobs. That’s serious stuff. On the other hand, is anyone going to bail out ME if I suddenly decided to become impervious to risk (stop giggling, Annie :D ) and make bad financial decisions? I think not.

    We’re screwed.

    Tink *~*~*

  • http://www.bluesgrassmama.com/ Bluegrass Mama

    My 13 year old daughter asked why they couldn’t just print more money, and I tried explaining that money actually had to be backed by something substantial.

    Silly me.

    I’m still scratching my head wondering why the heck people were taking out adjustable rate mortgages when the fixed 30 year rate was under 6%!

  • http://www.benched42.net/ BillH

    My problem with this whole fiasco is I don’t understand how throwing $700 billion at the problem fixes it. You’ve still got the same regulations, the same institutions, the same people making the same bad decisions on the same bad set of mandatory regulations for loans. Around here there are bankers who have stated on camera that they HAD to loan people the money knowing that they wouldn’t be able to pay it back because of the way the laws are written.

    Yeah, it would be very bad for the economy but I say let them sink. If I make a bunch of bad decisions (like going to the casino and gambling away my entire bank account) I’m told to get help at GA; nobody bails me out. I know that’s rather a simplistic analogy, but it doesn’t change my opinion. And giving the GOVERNMENT more control over this? No way. I believe it was PJ O’Rourke who said “Giving the government money to spend is like giving a teenager whiskey and car keys – only bad things can happen.”

blog comments powered by Disqus

  • Archives